$2.67 million lunch with Buffet

Bidding for Buffett

Chances are you’ve never paid anybody to have lunch with you, but chances are you aren’t Warren Buffett either.  Every year, the Sage from Omaha hosts an auction, with the highest bidder getting to join Buffett for lunch and bring seven guests—with the proceeds going to charity.  The winner in this, the 18th year of the auction, came in at $2.67 million, which is actually below last year’s winning bid, of $3.46 million.

The auction takes place on eBay, with an opening bid for this expensive lunch set at $25,000.  This year’s winning bidder is anonymous, but past winners include the owner of a Chinese online gaming company and Ted Weschler, a former hedge fund manager who was later hired to help run the investments of Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway operation.  In all, the auction has raised more than $25 million for a San Francisco charity called Glide, which offers free meals, health care and other services to homeless and low-income people in San Francisco.

As in the past, the lunch with Mr. Buffett will be at a steakhouse called Smith & Wollensky in New York.

 

Source:

http://www.nrt24.com/winning-bid-to-have-lunch-with-warren-buffett-2-7-million/102846/

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Realized Capital Loss 101

Investors are always learning.

One area that can be particularly challenging is gaining a better understanding of how our investments fold into the tax equation.

One such scenario is when a portfolio realizes a capital loss, also called tax loss harvesting.  Tax loss harvesting is a strategy with benefits that even some tax professionals may not understand. Here is a definition from Betterment:

“Tax loss harvesting is the practice of selling a security that has experienced a loss. By realizing, or “harvesting” a loss, investors are able to offset taxes on both gains and income. The sold security is replaced by a similar one, maintaining the optimal asset allocation and expected returns.”

At first glance, one may conclude that a capital loss is a sign of an unsuccessful year.  However, this couldn’t be further from the truth.

Why would an investor want to realize a capital loss?

First, there is a deduction of your capital loss against ordinary income.  For federal tax purposes, you apply $3,000 against ordinary income.  If you have social security, IRA distributions or other earned income that would otherwise be taxable, you can have at least $3,000 in capital losses in excess of capital gains.  In addition, there is a $5,000 deduction that can be taken on the state of Wisconsin tax return as well. These are a couple of benefits, but they may not be the most significant advantage.

The biggest advantage for individuals is when they have a capital loss and, if it’s on your books, it carries forward for at least 5 years and “may carry forward for future years”.  Visit www.irs.gov for more information of both capital gains and losses that match your unique scenario.   There is a limit for corporations.

In the future, if you have a situation where you need to take capital gains, you have this capital loss to write off against those gains or you can use the $3,000 deduction the following year.

We also strongly advocate tax planning throughout the year.  Travis Brock will elaborate on this in our next newsletter.

There are specific strategies that we use to actually harvest the loss which we will do throughout the year.  If you’re incurring a loss in the books for tax purposes, this cannot hurt you. There’s no harm in this and it’s actually a benefit.  We urge our clients to engage in a healthy conversation with their tax-preparer about this topic reinforcing the fact that a loss in an account, when evaluating the total financial and tax scenarios, is actually a positive thing because you are realizing the loss (reducing your tax liability) but maintaining the asset allocation.

There are, of course, scenarios where there is a significant investment gain, but for tax purposes individuals had a realized capital loss.   In the investment world, we consider that beautiful work!  It’s also important to note:  We can’t judge how your investments are doing based solely upon how much you’re paying in taxes, your income tax return or a portfolio gain or loss.  You have to put everything into context.

Part of our job as advisors is to assist new clients who come to us with their unique financial situations.  One scenario that we see is when an investor owns a significant number of mutual funds in their taxable account and the mutual funds have large redemptions during the year (investors get spooked and sell their shares). This forces the mutual funds to pay out a substantial amount in capital gains at the end of the year.   These distributions were unwanted and unexpected by the client since they lost money on their investments and to add insult to injury, had a large tax liability! That’s the converse of what we’re talking about here.  Because they had a significant tax liability does that mean they did well?  No, they actually lost money.  That’s the ugly opposing side of it when you lose money and have to pay taxes on top of it.

Folks who work with Financial Fiduciaries, LLC have the benefit of our staff monitoring this process closely for them.  We also provide clients with online tools where they too can track their portfolio’s progress and the tax implications.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Ask advisor for “fiduciary oath”

 

Who’s On Your Side?

Friday, June 9 quietly marked an historic day in the financial services world.  As of that date, all financial advisors are required to forego any sales agenda and give advice that would benefit their clients or customers—or, if they decide otherwise, to explain how and why they intend to give advice that instead primarily benefits themselves and their brokerage company.  This rule only pertains to rollovers from a qualified plan like a 401(k) into an IRA, and to the investment recommendations for that IRA account.  But it may be a first step toward something larger.

The polls consistently show that most Americans believe they already receive objective advice—called “fiduciary” advice by the profession and regulators.  But the overwhelming odds are that they do not.  There are half a million brokers who earn commissions if they can convince you to buy an expensive alternative to the thriftier, better-performing investment options on the market.  That’s more than ten times the number of advisors who adhere to a fiduciary standard.  Government research estimates that consumers lost $17 billion a year to conflicted advice in the recommendations made by brokers and sales agents posing as advisors related to retirement plans.  This, to put it bluntly, helps explain why so many Wall Street brokers are insulted if their annual bonus is in the low seven figures.

The actual number of real fiduciary advisors may actually be lower than this discouraging figure.  A mystery shopper study in the Boston area found that only 2.4% of the “advisors” (most were almost certainly brokers) it surveyed made what most would consider to be fiduciary recommendations.  On the other side, 85% advocated switching out of a thrifty portfolio with excellent funds into something a bit more self-serving.

An article in the most broker-friendly publication imaginable—Bloomberg—recently outlined some of the ways that you can be taken in by a sales pitch and never know it.  (The full article can be found here: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2017-06-07/fiduciary-rule-fight-brews-while-bad-financial-advisers-multiply. ) It notes that the brokerage industry—that is, the larger Wall Street firms, independent broker-dealer organizations and life insurance organizations—repeatedly fought the fiduciary rule in court, arguing, in some cases, that their brokers and insurance agents shouldn’t be held to this standard because, despite what they said or what the companies’ marketing materials proclaimed, they were nothing more than salespeople trying to effect a sale.  The courts refused to block the rule.

It gets worse.  Even though brokers are held to a sales standard—they are required to “know their customer” and to make investment recommendations that would be “suitable” to somebody in your circumstances (a very low standard that is appropriately known as “compliance”), a new study found that 8% of all brokers have a record of serious misconduct, and nearly half of those were kept on at their firms even after getting caught.

We don’t know how long this regulation will be in effect.  New Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta has announced that he’s studying whether the rule that requires brokers to act in the best interests of their customers is good or bad for customers, and his comments hint that he thinks you would be harmed if suddenly you were able to trust the advice you receive.  But there is one simple way to determine whether you’re working with somebody you can trust.

First, ask your advisor directly to provide written documentation that he or she will act in your best interests.  This should be no longer than a page and might be no longer than a sentence or two.  There’s even a “Fiduciary Oath” that many financial advisors are giving to their clients—without any prompting.  If the broker hems and haws, then hold onto your wallet or purse, because chances are any recommendations you receive are going to cost you money that will be disclosed in the fine print of whatever agreement you sign.

Sources:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2017-06-07/fiduciary-rule-fight-brews-while-bad-financial-advisers-multiply

http://www.dolfiduciaryrule.com/

http://www.newhampshire.com/article/20170604/NEWHAMPSHIRE02/170609837/1037

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Beam me up – instant diagnosis

 

Starship Medicine

If you’ve ever watched the Star Trek TV show, or any of the franchise’s movies, you’ve probably noticed that spaceship medicine is different from what we’re accustomed to.  Instead of a physical exam, on the Starship Enterprise, the doctor points a blinking device at the patient and arrives at an instant diagnosis of any health issue.

Could that ever happen in real life?  It could—and actually has.

Chip maker and tech company Qualcomm has been, since 2012, sponsoring a Tricorder XPrize Competition, offering $2.5 million to the company that can diagnose, with remote sensors, 13 health conditions: anemia, urinary tract infection, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, stroke, sleep apnea, tuberculosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pneumonia, otitis, leukocytosis and hepatitis.  The winning device would also be able to assess a patient’s vital signs, like blood pressure, respiratory rate and temperature through wireless sensors, imaging technologies and non-invasive replacements of laboratory equipment.  (A second prize of $1 million was also part of the competition.)

The social benefits of such a device are obvious: a huge percentage of the country’s health care spending goes toward expensive testing procedures, and fast, accurate diagnoses are also the key to fast, successful treatments.  Imagine a world where medical costs—including the costs of Medicare and health insurance premiums—are reduced by 30%, and people can buy a device that allows them to diagnose their own ailments.

In all, 312 teams entered the competition, including government-sponsored groups and medical corporations.  The recently-announced winner: Final Frontier Medical Devices, founded by an emergency medicine doctor named Basil Harris.

Instead of a hand-held device, the winning tricorder—called DxtER, is roughly the size of a shoe box, containing several individual diagnostic devices and sensors that patients can apply to themselves.  The devices, linked to an Apple iPad, will actually go beyond the specifications and diagnose 34 different medical conditions, in addition to the aforementioned vital signs.  The next round of the competition will look for a way to create a commercial version.

Sources:

http://tricorder.xprize.org/about/overview

https://arstechnica.com/science/2017/04/underdog-team-wins-millions-in-competition-to-make-real-life-tricorder/

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Let’s talk about happiness – workplace, cities

 

Workplace Happiness—and Not So Much

 

What are the happiest and unhappiest jobs in the U.S. economy?   Put another way, what careers would you want to steer your children and grandchildren toward and away from if you want them to be happy during their work hours?

Recently, CareerBliss, a fulfillment-focused job search website that collects more than six million independent company reviews and three million job listings, has reported on the jobs that provide the most and least personal satisfaction.

Number one on the “happiest” list: recruiters, who basically sell the merits of their company to prospective employees.  After that, there was a strong tech theme to happiness at work.  The number two happiest job: full-stack developer—basically a programmer who creates customized web and mobile applications.  Research assistants, senior Java developers, Android developers, chief technology officers, lead engineers, lead developers, software engineers and chief operating officers round out the top ten.

The bottom job on the list was sales account manager, whose workers were considered a bit less happy than security officers.  Merchandisers, cashiers, drivers, maintenance managers, guards, sales professionals, machine operators and service technicians rounded out the bottom ten.

CareerBliss also listed the happiest cities to work in, and six of the top 20 happen to be located in California: Santa Clara (1), San Jose (2), San Francisco (5), San Diego (10), Los Angeles (11) and Irvine (19).  Portland, Oregon (3), Cincinnati, Ohio (4), Austin, Texas (6), Nashville, Tennessee (7), Boston, Massachusetts (8) and Washington, D.C. (9) were also reported to be high on the happiness scale.

Source:

https://www.careerbliss.com/facts-and-figures/careerbliss-happiest-and-unhappiest-jobs-in-america-2016/

 

https://www.careerbliss.com/facts-and-figures/careerbliss-2017-happiest-cities-to-work/

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Maybe these are the good ol’ days

 

It’s not uncommon to hear people wish that we could return to the “good old days,” when the world seemed more prosperous.  Of course, depending on how far you go back, the “good old days” might cover a time when the world was poised on the edge of a nuclear precipice, when the Soviet Union and other communist governments basically enslaved more than 50% of the world’s population, when racism was practiced openly and codified in the legal system, when there was no Internet or smartphones, and when TV entertainment consisted of three or sometimes four channels on a heavy, small-screen device that didn’t include a remote.

 

If you consider our world’s economic history, it actually appears that most of are, today, living in the good old days.  The chart, from the website Our World in Data, shows the change in GDP per capita since 1960—a measure of whether individual countries have increased their overall wealth in the past 54 years.  The dots are individual countries, and if you look at the placement of the dots, you can see the average GDP in 1960 (along the bottom) vs. today (along the left side).  The line moving diagonally across the graph is important: any country whose dot falls above that line has experienced positive GDP growth per citizen.As you can see, pretty much all the dots are above the line, in many cases far above.  The highest per capita GDP country today is Luxembourg, followed by Singapore, Norway and Switzerland.  The U.S. is on the upper right side of the graph, meaning that it was one of the most prosperous nations in the world in 1960, and still is.

 

The countries at the bottom of the graph, Central African Republic and Niger, started poor and became more so over the past 54 years.  For them, the “good old days” weren’t so great, but they were better than today.

 

CA - 2017-4-15 - Economic Progress

 

Source:

 

https://ourworldindata.org/extreme-poverty/

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Impact of “extreme vetting” on tourism

The height of the tourism season is fast approaching.  The economic impact on tourism resulting from “extreme vetting” is now raising some questions regarding global travel.

In an effort to secure the U.S. borders, the President has attempted to ban visitors from seven Muslim-majority countries, and is meanwhile quietly instituting “extreme vetting” of visitors from other nations—asking them to turn over their phones, social media passwords and financial records.  Even U.S. citizens are experiencing more scrutiny when they attempt to return to their home country.

America may be safer today than it was three months ago, but at what cost?  One predictable consequence of increased border vigilance has been a drop in tourism to the U.S., not just from the nations listed in the travel ban, but China (down 40% this year) Ireland and New Zealand (35%), and reportedly also from Mexico, Canada and the European Union.  In all, Tourism Economics has estimated that 4.3 million fewer people will visit the U.S. this year, resulting in $7.4 billion of lost tourist revenue.  Next year, if the trend continues, the U.S. economy could experience a 6.3 million drop in tourists and a $10.8 billion reduction in tourist revenue.

 

 

Source:

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/capitalbusiness/after-trumps-travel-ban-tourism-outfits-say-that-brand-usa-has-taken-a-hit/2017/04/14/d0eebf4e-158e-11e7-833c-503e1f6394c9_story.html?tid=ss_tw&utm_term=.05f2b1f60a2a

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment